The Open Scholarship Initiative
Working together in partnership with UNESCO to improve the future of open

Conversations

    RSS OSI Listserv

    • take a survey, win a prize (maybe)! December 19, 2018
      The following is a two-part survey (for OSIers only) regarding OSI's approach toward open in general, and toward Plan S specifically. This should take about 3 minutes to complete. https://goo.gl/forms/hEP7xPluolMPXVSg2 OSI participants who complete this survey will be entered into a
    • Re: BLOG: Book Review: Scholarly Communication – what everyone needs to know(R) December 19, 2018
      "SUPPORTING RESEARCH COMMUNICATIONS: A GUIDE" https://www.supporters.guide This recommendation is not exactly a gift idea as this book is free (download the PDF from the website above). But, this book is a gift to us all in scholarly communications. This book is for funders, institutions,
    • RE: BLOG: Book Review: Scholarly Communication – what everyone needs to know® December 19, 2018
      Thank you Danny! I just ordered my copy! Here’s the link: https://amzn.to/2PNOTZ1. Congrats Rick! This is at least the third book OSIers have published in the last few years, right? Caroline’s book (“The Collaborative Era in Science”-- https://amzn.to/2R6u7s9 ) came out two months ago, and
    • Re: Basic question about Plan S, OSI, and universal OA December 18, 2018
      > lack of uniform and coordinated pressure (based on unmet needs) to change. I suspect that it’s also partly an informed and principled disagreement on the part of some members of the system that either the system is actually broken, or that the proposed fixes are the right ones. As
    • RE: Basic question about Plan S, OSI, and universal OA December 18, 2018
      Hi Mike, It really is a fascinating dive. I’m not sure how much patience everyone here has for too much back and forth on it so I’ll make one last observation and then bow out. (Rick and Ilona are cooking up a survey on this general issue---it will be fun to see what OSIers think; […]
    • Re: Basic question about Plan S, OSI, and universal OA December 18, 2018
      This is one of the reasons I really like the term “ecosystem” to describe scholarly communication. It’s a classic business ecosystem: a “network of organizations – including suppliers, distributors, customers, competitors, government agencies and so on—involved in the delivery of a specific
    • RE: Basic question about Plan S, OSI, and universal OA December 18, 2018
      Dear Friends, I want to support David in this discussion. The systemic nature of scholarly publications is not simply a semantic turn. I study the system as a system and it has measureable systemic qualities. As a system, it has developed over centuries, adapting to social changes along the way.
    • Re: Basic question about Plan S, OSI, and universal OA December 18, 2018
      As an analyst I am well aware of all this, Roy. My point is painfully simple. Your desire to reform the system does not make the system broken. The point is semantic if you like, but in an important way. (My Ph.D. field is analytic philosophy which argues that precise language is important.) The
    • RE: Suggestion to start a new Plan S Brief December 18, 2018
      Hi Scott, The mechanism for making representative decisions for OSI existed in the original governance plan. We never tried it out. Essentially, it would be a majority vote of the full summit, which is/was appointed to represented all 18 stakeholder groups (with one rep from most groups, and
    • Re: Basic question about Plan S, OSI, and universal OA December 18, 2018
      Mike, We just have to agree to disagree. I find the application of the social justice metaphor to science to be inappropriate. Science is measured by its outputs. My objection to Plan S is that it will stifle innovation, which other OA programs do not. I continue to ask, Why must things be

Stakeholder blogs

An overview of the Plan S debate

‘Plan S’ sets out ten principles, many of which have been foreshadowed in previous policy documents and developments. Nevertheless, when taken together they represent a...
Read More

Plan S explained

Open scholar and journalist Richard Poynder recently published an interview with Robert-Jans Smits, the Open Access Envoy of the European Commission and architect of Plan...
Read More

Key themes from SciELO at 20

Last week, ScieELO celebrated its 20th anniversary by hosting more than 600 leaders from across scholarly communication (including 10 from OSI) to discuss the current...
Read More

10 years on and where are we at? COASP 2018

Last week, the 10th Conference on Open Access Scholarly Publishing (COASP) was held in Vienna. Much was covered over the two and a half days....
Read More

On the EPA’s proposed rule to strengthen transparency in science

OSI is a very diverse group, including over 400 leaders from 24 countries, 250 institutions and 18 scholarly communication stakeholder groups—publishers, universities, researchers, libraries, open...
Read More

Defining the foundations of open scholarship

What do the foundation of open scholarship look like at a really granular level? Exactly what is open scholarship, how do we get there in...
Read More
milky-way

Achieving open science by design

How do we get to a future where open science is the norm? The US National Academies of Sciences, Engineering and Medicine recently commissioned a...
Read More
typewriter

Deceptive publishing: Summarizing the OSI conversation

The demise of Beall’s list has left a void in scholarly communications. Contested as his original lists were, they brought focus to an important issue...
Read More

OSI on Twitter